Advocates Say Court Decision Will Hurt Immigrants

*Very good summary of the Supreme Court’s immigration stalemate. It’s by our partners at Public News Service. VL


public news serviceBy Mark Richardson, Public News Service (1.5 minute read)

AUSTIN, Texas — Immigration rights advocates in Texas and other states are blasting a Supreme Court decision Thursday, which could doom President Obama’s expanded immigration policies.

The justices’ 4-4 tie vote allowed a lower court decision to stand, preventing the president from shielding about 4 million people from deportation. The “deferred action” plans would give temporary protections to families with mixed immigration status and some people who entered the country as children.

Attorney Edgar Saldivar with the ACLU of Texas said the court’s deadlock brings uncertainty to a large number of undocumented immigrants.

“A ruling, by having a tie, sends this matter down to the district court,” he said, “and leaves in limbo hundreds of thousands of immigrants who would have had some peace of mind on their status and their ability to work, and things like that.”

The lower court ruling came after Texas and 25 other states sued over the expanded immigration plans, which were announced two years ago. The states had argued that the president overstepped his authority, and were upheld by the high court’s tie vote.

Celina Villanueva, youth engagement manager for the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, argued that the presidents’ expansion actions were building on the success of his 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program (DACA). The expanded program was to be called the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA).

“We’ve seen the effect that it’s had on young people who have been able to live their lives, go on to school, get jobs,” she said. “It’s a positive impact. A lot of the people that would be covered by DAPA are parents of children who are U.S. citizens.”

Read more NewsTaco stories on Facebook. >> 

The Supreme Court’s ruling effectively means Obama cannot take further executive actions on immigration.

The Supreme Court’s decision is online at scotusblog.com.

This article was originally published in Public News Service



[Photo by Bread for the World/Flickr]

Suggested reading

crossing_borders

“On good days I feel I am a bridge. On bad days I just feel alone,” Sergio Troncoso writes in this riveting collection of sixteen personal essays in which he seeks to connect the humanity of his Mexican family to people he meets on the East Coast, including his wife’s Jewish kin. Raised in a home steps from the Mexican border in El Paso, Texas, Troncoso crossed what seemed an even more imposing border when he left home to attend Harvard College.
Initially, “outsider status” was thrust upon him; later, he adopted it willingly, writing about the Southwest and Chicanos in an effort to communicate who he was and where he came from to those unfamiliar with his childhood world. He wrote to maintain his ties to his parents and his abuelita, and to fight against the elitism he experienced at an Ivy League school. “I was torn,” he writes, “between the people I loved at home and the ideas I devoured away from home.”
Troncoso writes to preserve his connections to the past, but he puts pen to paper just as much for the future. In his three-part essay entitled “Letter to My Young Sons,” he documents the terror of his wife’s breast cancer diagnosis and the ups and downs of her surgery and treatment. Other essays convey the joys and frustrations of fatherhood, his uneasy relationship with his elderly father and the impact his wife’s Jewish heritage and religion have on his Mexican-American identity.
[cc_product sku=”978-1-55885-710-0″ display=”inline” quantity=”true” price=”true”]

Subscribe today!

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Must Read