May 19, 2013
Tag Archives: Latino Voices News

 Powered by Max Banner Ads 

Latinos Less Likely To Get Time Off, Workplace Flexibility

By Huffington Post Latino Voices

With the holidays just around the corner, most employees are thinking about taking time off work.

But for many Latinos, paid leave won’t be an option. According to a study released Tuesday by the Center for American Progress, Latinos have the least access to paid sick days or parental leave, let alone paid vacation.

Only 38.4 percent of Latinos have paid leave available, compared to 64.7 percent of Asians, 60.4 percent of whites and 57.4 percent of blacks. The study attributes the difference to “historical trends resulting from decades of institutionalized racism and the fact that workers of color are more likely than white workers to be employed in low-wage, low-quality jobs.”

“For too many Latinos, being a good worker and a good family member has become mutually exclusive,” the study states.

In addition to less…

READ MORE HERE

This article was fiorst published in Huffington Post Latino Voices

[Photo by  wools]

 

Fiscal Cliff: Poorest School Districts Stand To Lose The Most

By Joy Resmovits, Huffington Post Latino Voices

Juandiego Wade is worried.

As vice chair of the Charlottesville City School Board in Virginia, he’s responsible for the well-being of its 4,000 students. And if Congress doesn’t come up with a solution to upcoming automatic budget cuts soon, his students may feel the loss. “We’ve already been cut to the bone,” Wade said. So with the estimated reduction of $350,000 to his district’s budget, it’s hard to see what else can go before cutting teachers. Charlottesville may have to fire four teachers, special education programs, and help for delinquent students.

As the federal government faces what’s become known as the fiscal cliff, education advocates are lobbying, organizing and campaigning to protect their programs. On Wednesday, the National School Boards Association trotted out school board members, including Wade, on a conference call to make their case.

“Our state got a lot of attention during the last election. we got a lot of visits from all the politicians, a lot of money was spent,” Wade said. “We’re wishing some of that is spent now on education.”

Advocates said across-the-board cuts may threaten the entire network of supports for U.S. children, particularly those who live in poverty. Earlier this year, U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan testified before a Senate committee to warn against the cuts. “Essentially we’re just playing chicken with the lives of the American people,” he said at the time.

Now, as the reality of 7.8 percent cuts loom, lobbyists are stepping up their efforts — even as legislators warned that negotiations could be lengthy. “Sit back, this is going to take a while,” Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) told The Hill, describing a meeting with House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio).

Three federal programs critical to education — Title I funds for poor students, state grants for special education and the Head Start public pre-school program — would lose $2.7 billion over 10 years, predicted a Senate report based on the Congressional Budget Office projection that sequestration would slash spending by 7.8 percent. As many as 15,000 teachers and aides may lose their jobs, and 10,000 special education workers may be laid off.

Deborah Rigsby, the National School Boards Association’s legislative director, put it in stark terms. “For every $1 million in federal aid that a school district receives, sequestration would cut $82,000, or more than one teacher,” Rigsby said. “These cuts to our schools would be devastating and of course would impact student achievement.”

Though federal spending accounts for about 8 percent of all education dollars, the U.S. contribution is larger in poorer areas. According to an analysis by the New America Foundation, large districts such as Los Angeles, Philadelphia and Miami-Dade rely on federal funding for more than 15 percent of their budgets. Milwaukee and Chicago use U.S. cash to sponsor more than one fifth of their schools’ costs.

Smaller…

READ MORE HERE

This article was first published in Huffington Post Latino Voices.

Joy Resmovits is a Huffington Post education reporter. She most recently worked as a Fellow at the Jewish Daily Forward. Before that, she wrote for the Wall Street Journal’s Greater New York section. She has also contributed to the New York Daily News, Education Update, the Columbia Daily Spectator, and the St. Louis Beacon. She graduated from Barnard College.

[Photo by  DonkeyHotey]

Latino Electorate Will Nearly Double In 20 Years

By Janell Ross, Huffington Post Latino Voices

If last week’s election outcome stunned Mitt Romney’s campaign and converted some Republicans to the orthodoxy of urgent and comprehensive immigration reform, then a Pew Hispanic Center report released Wednesday may spin the political world off its axis.

In the next two decades, a convergence of social and demographic trends will nearly double the number of Latinos who are eligible to vote, from 23.7 million today to about 40 million by 2032, according to the Pew report. In 2012, Latinos comprised 11 percent of the electorate. They will make up 16 percent of eligible voters by 2032, the report said.

Latino voters already are the fastest-growing portion of the electorate and cast 10 percent of all the ballots in the presidential election. The Pew report shows Latinos will be an indisputable key to the White House, several state capitols and thousands of local councils and school boards. Such a dramatic shift in the American electorate -– the adults who are eligible to register and vote -– could force new political alliances, policy priorities and alter who wins public office.

“I think the growing size of this population and the dispersement of this population around the country may not be fully understood,” said Mark Hugo Lopez, associate director of the Pew Hispanic Center, a nonpartisan research center based in Washington. “But it should be.

“Just look at what happened this year,” said Lopez. “Latino voters proved to be pivotal in battleground states where people expected like Nevada, Colorado and Florida, places with a large Latino vote. And then in places like Virginia and Iowa, places with small Latino populations, their votes proved decisive.”

In Iowa, Obama won by just under six percentage points. Latinos make up nearly 3 percent of the state’s voters and all but a quarter of these individuals cast ballots for President Barack Obama. In Virginia, the race was even tighter. Obama beat Romney by just three points. Latinos make up 2.3 percent of that state’s voters and all but about 23 percent voted for Obama.

A few weeks before the election, Sylvia Manzano, a senior analyst at Latino Decisions, an independent polling firm, projected that Romney would not be able to win unless he somehow swept the table of battleground states. Instead, Romney lost every swing state except North Carolina.

The influence of the Latino vote and growing Hispanic voter participation was so decisive that Obama mentioned both in his first post-election…

READ MORE HERE

This article was first published in Huffington Post Latino Voices.

Janell Ross is a reporter who covers political and economic issues at the Huffington Post, based in New York. Previously she worked as a business reporter at The Huffington Post and covered business, immigration, race and social issues at The Tennessean in Nashville. Janell also covered covered local politics, labor and higher education at The News & Observer in Raleigh and the Corpus Christi Caller-Times. Janell earned a bachelor’s degree from Vassar College and a master’s degree from the Columbia University School of Journalism.

[Photo by Una Voz Unida of Odessa]